On Sunday morning a Twitter user named Bruno Zupan screenshots of four Instagram photos: a man’s hand holding a Geiger counter. A woman posing near a burned-out bus. A woman in a hard hat and face mask. And, most disturbingly, a woman pulling down a hazmat suit to reveal her white thong. All were geo-tagged Pripyat, Ukraine, the left in shambles after the disastrous nuclear accident at the Chernobyl power plant in 1986. “Meanwhile in Chernobyl,” Zupan wrote, “Instagram influencers flocking to the site of the disaster.”Meanwhile in Chernobyl: Instagram influencers flocking to the site of the disaster.— Bruno Zupan (@komacore)By yesterday evening, Zupan’s tweet had been collectively shared tens of thousands of times. Even Chrissy Teigen retweeted it to her 11.2 million followers.
But the viral tweet’s claim is false, and its premise—that photos at sites of tragedy are inherently self-serving and in poor taste—is misleading. Irene Vivch, a 19-year-old student, had just 204 followers when she posted the photo of herself by the bus as part of a larger gallery of images.
“I do not consider myself a ‘full-time influencer,’” she told me over Instagram direct message. “Chernobyl made a massive impression on me. So I made a big Instagram post about it describing my feelings.” Vivch was born in Ukraine and is deeply familiar with the history of the disaster. Her caption, which Zupan cropped out, was a paragraphs-long reflection on the event that called Chernobyl “an eternal monument to the horrid cruelty of the Soviet regime.”. The woman who posted the most, uses the handle @nz.nik. She isn’t an influencer at all: She had just over 1,500 followers at the time of her post.The one influencer who was referenced in Zupan’s tweet is, the woman who posted the photo of herself wearing a hard hat. Baessler included a somber message with her post: “Yesterday I had the chance to visit one of the most fascinating but also most terrible places on earth.
![]()
The ASFPM Flood Hazard Fellowship Fund (FHFF), established by the Board of Directors on May 3, 1988, is used to provide awards to recognize and encourage individual achievement in the profession of flood hazard management. The flooding has taken a heavy toll on agriculture in the region, inundating tens of thousands of acres, threatening stockpiled grain and killing livestock.
Standing there is just indescribable, it’s shocking and something I will never forget.” Over Instagram direct message, she told me that the HBO show had nothing to do with her decision to visit the site. “There was no photographer and no lighting team,” she said. “Because of the engineering work of my boyfriend, we were able to get a special admission to go inside control room 4, which is actually not accessible for visitors. I wanted to share these stories with the world because they are full of information of a place where usually only scientists get access to.”. But for thousands of people who retweeted and responded to Zupan’s tweet, the subtext was clear: Look at these vapid influencers, fishing for likes when they should be respecting the tragic nature of the site. Craig Mazin, the writer and producer of the HBO miniseries, responded to the controversy on Twitter. “It’s wonderful that #ChernobylHBO has inspired a wave of tourism to the Zone of Exclusion.
But yes, I’ve seen the photos going around,”. “If you visit, please remember that a terrible tragedy occurred there.
Comport yourselves with respect for all who suffered and sacrificed.”Instagram, with more than 1 billion active users, has become the default way for many, especially young people, to share and document their lives. But people still struggle with how to best format their posts from solemn places. A crying photo will get you ridiculed for being inauthentic or cringey. Present yourself too seriously and you’ll look like you’re “posing for a rap album cover amid the abandoned buildings,” as put it.
You could, as some seem to wish, not share anything at all. But as Natalie Shure, who researches history for TruTV, “Most people do it specifically because they want to remember the site and what it meant to them. Those goals are in line with those of public history projects, not antithetical to them.”Before social media, remembering tragedies through personal photos was a private act. I can remember, just months after 9/11, visiting Ground Zero with my mother and asking her to snap a photo of me in front of it with my disposable camera. I wanted to remember not just what it looked like, but that I had been there. I kept the photo in my desk for years. It’s not inconceivable that had I been born 15 years later, I might have posted it to Instagram.What makes photos posted to Instagram so awkward is that they’re inherently formatted for consumption rather than reflection.
Not long after the app first launched, simply running photos of the site of a tragedy through Instagram’s default filtering tools was seen as gauche. Some people believed posting images of Auschwitz to the app at all. It seemed wrong to reformat horror in an aesthetically pleasing way, then hope people engaged with it by tapping a Like button. But as Instagram grew, it transformed into users’ default camera. The app was soon less about beautiful photography and more about documenting your life. 2014 ushered in the era of the selfie, a format that was initially seen as frivolous and self-absorbed. When a recent high-school graduate from Alabama Auschwitz-Birkenau to Twitter in 2014, she faced mass backlash.
To many, it seemed crass for all the same reasons that posting filtered photos had been years earlier. It was still interpreted as garish.In 2019, everyone takes selfies. Meanwhile, a class of users who have been gaining increasing prominence on Instagram, have ushered in a new era on the platform. “At some point Instagram switched its culture from ‘pictures you took’ to ‘picture of you,’” the technologist Nicole He.
As influencer culture trickles down and, new norms have emerged. Posed photos are standard, particularly among younger users. These staged, full-body shots are sometimes criticized as attention grabs, and a few. But as my colleague Alexis Madrigal noted to me, part of the reason people get so angry at images like the ones in Zupan’s tweet is because of a perceived gap between where attention should be aimed (the tragedy of Chernobyl) and what viewers interpret to be the focus of the photo (a person posing for the camera).Blatantly rude and disrespectful behavior, such as or climbing on the property of a historical site, is inexcusable.
But a brief search of the Pripyat geo-tag reveals a stream of people who have simply posed for photos throughout the site. Instagram Stories tagged there include videos of visitors goofing off on a tour, a woman smiling on a swing, a man making funny faces into his front-facing lens. When removed from the context of Instagram, they’re jarring.
But ultimately, “” from Chernobyl say less about any imagined wave of rude influencers “flocking” to the site and more about the shifting norms around how people document their lives and experiences on Instagram. While some critics might still view the posts as distasteful and insensitive, most of these users are all trying to say the same thing: I was here.We want to hear what you think about this article. To the editor or write to [email protected].
Published 3:54 PM EDT May 23, 2019Some homes in Mississippi have been flooded since February, and it could be weeks to months before the waters recede, according to emergency officials.An estimated 544,000 acres are submerged, 515 homes damaged and hundreds of businesses impacted, according to Mississippi Gov. The damage could be in the tens of millions of dollars.Bryant, speaking at a news conference held at Mississippi Emergency Management Agency's headquarters in Pearl Wednesday, called the disaster 'historic.'
'The 1927 (flood) was a line of demarcation for most of us who live in the Delta,' Bryant said. 'This may replace that. This is indeed the great flood of Mississippi.' Barbara Gauntt/Clarion LedgerThe flood has prompted renewed calls for the federal government to reconsider a flood control and drainage project that was killed by the George W. Bush administration because of its potential impact on wetlands and wildlife.Bryant said the Environmental Protection Agency is now reviewing a 2008 decision to veto the project.He said the project could reduce the amount of acreage flooded in the Yazoo backwater area by half. 'Weeks or even months' for return to normalcyCol. Mike Derosier, commander of the Vicksburg district of the U.S.
![]()
Corps of Engineers, said the National Weather Service has provided a forecast that shows a slight drop in the river, then a rise again in early June.Derosier said it's been above flood stage in Vicksburg for 95 days — a new record since the flood of 1927.' It's going to take weeks or even months for things to return back to normal in the Yazoo backwater area,' he said.In addition to high waters in the Mississippi River, water has collected in a basin behind the levees.Derosier compared the basin to a bathtub, filled with water. The tub's plug is the Steele Bayou, north of Vicksburg. The area can't be drained until the river's levels are lower.' It will not be gone anytime soon,' said MEMA Director Gregory Michel. Barbara Gauntt/Clarion LedgerFlooding claims Eagle LakeOver the weekend, the floodwaters claimed yet another community — Eagle Lake, north of Vicksburg, which has been fighting the incoming watery disaster with miles of sandbag barriers for months.Many residents have evacuated the area, and a few are left, said John Elfer, head of the Office of Emergency Management in Warren County.'
This has resulted thus far with no loss of life,' Elfer said. 'That's our primary concern — life safety.' Warren County Sheriff Martin Pace said his office has set up a substation at Eagle Lake, and deputies are monitoring the area closely.There have been no problems with looting and no injuries, he said.He warned members of the public to keep out of areas restricted by flooding if they don't have specific business there.(Story continues after photo gallery.) 'Dramatic loss of income' for farmersAbout 250,000 acres of the 544,000 impacted by flooding are agricultural.Bryant said floodwaters will keep many farmers from planting a crop this year.' (Farmers will experience) a dramatic loss of income,' he said. 'Not only are their homes flooded, they won't have a crop.' The impact goes beyond farmers.Michel said an individual housing assistance center has been set up in Warren County.FEMA initially denied a disaster declaration for the impacted counties, Michel said, because MEMA wasn't able to get damage estimates due to the ongoing flooding.' We're appealing that,' he said.
'This is not a normal flooding event.' Once a disaster declaration is secured, people will be able to apply for assistance.Farmers will also be able to request assistance from a different agency for agricultural-related losses, he said.' Thanks to all those individuals working hard in the Eagle Lake community and counties affected,' Michel said. 'Our hearts and prayers go out to them and the folks who are affected.' To keep up with the latest on flooding in Mississippi, get your digital subscription to the the Mississippi Clarion Ledger.The Associated Press contributed to this report.Contact Alissa Zhu at [email protected]. Follow @AlissaZhu on Twitter.
Comments are closed.
|
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |